Originally Posted by populationcontrol

haha yeah well i love it and will defend it till death, you guys must be a bunch of offended wamos, jk. but yeah anyways thought id share it anyways never really seen anyone post anything like it and its just an option to explore other things other than standard builds as ss or transfer.

Originally Posted by populationcontrol

anyways thought id share it anyways never really seen anyone post anything like it and its just an option to explore other things other than standard builds as ss or transfer.

Originally Posted by populationcontrol

well yeah its obviously easier to get gladiator ranks through random arenas for the simple reason you dont always have to kill the enemies team monk. also people will leave and return till they get a monk so if you have a good team in ra, its almost guaranteed at least once per 10 win streak entire opposite team will just leave. also if ur a fan of organized teams you can still get at least 3 people with organized builds into same team in ra by timing enter battle clickage, ra is standard glad point farming

Originally Posted by populationcontrol

well i think that this thread has steered off topic in the sense that a few of you are more interested in steering the thread into rude or disrespectful remarks through angry mob mentality, never the less i will try to answer your concerns all at once as to avoid by each new thread getting 4 new attacks.

"whats your point"
my point in saying previous thread obviously was to explain to the guy semmingly unperienced at this , that glad points through random arena is the fastest and easiest way to get gladiator points, and is where 95% of them are farmed for the reasons stated above, and yeah there builds that do more damage such as air spikers, but rangers assasins, mesmers, wars can specialise in killing them. my build offers less outright damage but counters most of their strentghs vs casters, and literally all your attacks heals you giving you higher chances of survival than the average ele. its not an anti monk build obviously, its made to counter and overwhelm attacks, yet you canhelp your team kill monk significantly.

"this build is awful"
considering you thinks its good to take a a necro with high soul reap into 4 vs 4 and probably mm skills its just kind of funny... or maybe just sad. look you might be a great monk but maybe your not at all the necromancer player you claim to be.

"lol @ heal signet"
yeah well ripostes make you invulnerable to damage while using it as explained above. besides it suits the build because you can avoid the armor penalty, costs no energy and what other self heal do you use, ether feast? parasitic bond? lol healing breeze? or what not self heal at all? id also like to add degen necros are awesome, i dont use them cause for a max degen self heal skills arent reliable for my point of view.

dueling builds are "RETARDED", i fail to see your point, in 4 vs 4 you will most of the fight one character at a time, and also at least once but glad streak youll find your the last one standing agaisnt one other player at least once. i think beeing able to kill that player is very intellegent not otherwise. also by saying this its clear that all of your builds are heavily reliant on monks, and frankly to die 1 vs 1 is unforgivable unless your like a mesmer, or healer with no res.

to answer the newcomers question, no a touch ranger would most likely own you 1 on 1. but soul leech especially combined with touch spells gives you a better chance at defeating him though its more likely hell win. however you can make it a lot easier to kill in the sense sl will reduce hp provided by blood atacks, and the elite they use to get energy will come at a higher hp sacrifice making them much easier prey for your allies.


look it is obvious to me by some of the posts that despite your harsh criticisms none of you actually bothered to try the build and therefore dont even know what your talking about (*ahem* even though theyve tried a *ahem*healing hands war to get glad points*), hence dont think that your remarks unerve me in any way. i got my glad ranks through mainly this build and know of its unconventional effectiveness. its not invincible but certainly has an edge with just about everything. Its like im not asking you if the build is good, i know its good and im posting it because it came through a great deal of pvp research, and i would have liked to come accross it before hand. ive gotten great feedback from my friends and guildies, and that you dont like it is fine but really why steer the conversation towards rudeness. im a far cry away from beeing a newb and you may say what you like all said and done my build im sharing is original, can you say the same about yours?

Originally Posted by Snow Bunny

A. High soul reaping is a plus, you should look into it sometime. Also, I'm a mediocre necro player at best, but I am good enough to know this build = fail. Look, I cast spiteful spirit on you. You die.

B. In 4v4, you don't duel. You gank the monk, kill it, and kill the next character. Even RA is a team effort; you make the best of what you can. You don't duel; while you're dueling against a riposte wammo, that SP sin and air spiker have chewed your teammates alive and are laughing at you.

C. I can't think of anything that wouldn't kill this. A toucher certainly would.

D. If you're going to defend a badly compiled build that was the result of extensive "research", it looks slightly more professional and legit if your posts are not riddled with grammatical/spelling mistakes. Just a pointer for you.

Originally Posted by Mokone

wrong. TA is, but i don't expect you to know that anyways.#




just stop defending bad builds, don't be stubborn and everyone is happy.

and yes, i've tried yours, i faced both good and bad players, while i could farm bad players, i couldn't do shit to good ones, which would've been the case with a good build. now, i doubt i'd ever get a gladpoint with this build, only if all of the other 3 have superb builds that will take me with my awful build along.